The former Everton star netted the strike against Arsenal at St James’ Park earlier this month in controversial circumstances. There was a near five-minute wait between the ball hitting the back of the net and the goal being awarded.
The goal was given on-field, only for VAR to intervene. Arsenal thought they had good reason for it to be chalked off, believing that the ball had gone out of play, while they also called for offside.
However, they also protested that Gabriel had been fouled by compatriot Joelinton as he knocked the ball down for Gordon to smash home. New audio released as part of the Mic’d Up programme has revealed that the officiating team did not even consider the Arsenal star being fouled.
During assessment of the incident, the VAR said: “I don’t see a specific foul on Gabriel. I see two hands on his back but I don’t see anything of a push that warrants him flying forward like that.”
That audio is unlikely to be a consolation for Mikel Arteta, who launched into a passionate rant post-match concerning the decision. PGMOL chief Howard Webb also explained exactly why the goal was allowed to stand as part of the programme.
Do you think Arsenal's goal vs Newcastle should have stood? Share your thoughts in the comments below
He said: “This was a big moment - an unusual situation with three aspects for the VAR to check whether or not the on-field decision of goal should be overturned. We see the ball getting very close to the goalline - don’t forget we have an Assistant Referee who is right in line - the ball hasn't got a lot of pace as it goes to the goalline, so he's looking right down the line better than any of our cameras.
“And we know the ball is curved, so it can be over-hanging the line and we need evidence it's out, and we don’t have that here. The ball then comes over and Joelinton challenges Gabriel, and it could be a foul, might be a foul. The VAR decides that the evidence from the footage isn't clear enough to intervene with a recommendation for a review for a clear error.
Buy your Rainbow Laces
Get your special pair of Glitter Edition Rainbow Laces to mark the 10-year anniversary here. Mirror readers get 20% off with code MIRROR20 (subject to availability).
undefined
"I think the talks we've seen after, the opinion that is split across a lot of analysis, would suggest that was a correct non-intervention because of the subjectivity. And then one of those unusual situations where the ball goes between two players, and trying to identify exactly when the ball leaves Joelinton, is really difficult to establish because of the players being so close together.
"So again, no conclusive evidence that Gordon was offside when the ball was last touched. The VAR went through that diligently and identified no clear evidence to intervene to overturn the goal. The process was actually correct."
However, despite doubling down that the decision to award the goal was correct. The head of referees did accept that both Kai Havertz and Bruno Guimaraes should have seen red for fouls during the controversial affair.
0 Comments